go2roomshare
02-01 01:04 PM
why this thread is still active? should be closed
wallpaper Swift has some. Carrie
vivek_k
08-13 01:24 PM
a2p is ability to pay
Thanks Ravise! Is that a question about the ability of the employer's ability to pay?
Thanks Ravise! Is that a question about the ability of the employer's ability to pay?
good idea
04-20 04:02 PM
You are perfectly OK.
Until USCIS takes a "decision" which is "approved / denied", you keep the legal status.
Thanks...
Premium? If $1300 is not a matter for you yes.
RFE response & Premimum are two different chanels now in your case, they will be updated separately.
Remember the Premium process begins the moment USCIS enters data into the system. Not the day your check is received.
Thanks...
But it is worth. You will get a decision (with RFE response on its way) within a month.
thanks...
Until USCIS takes a "decision" which is "approved / denied", you keep the legal status.
Thanks...
Premium? If $1300 is not a matter for you yes.
RFE response & Premimum are two different chanels now in your case, they will be updated separately.
Remember the Premium process begins the moment USCIS enters data into the system. Not the day your check is received.
Thanks...
But it is worth. You will get a decision (with RFE response on its way) within a month.
thanks...
2011 hit the Golden Globes solo
pom
10-04 07:40 PM
Ouh, neato! But I don't like the Kirupaforum thing at the bottom :-\
more...
INSpector
08-18 06:44 AM
MIne was updated 2 days later, be patient
ps57002
09-30 08:00 AM
Interesting is they say "you may have trouble coming in" but for valid h1 holders it should not be a problem (wasn't for me..i traveled). They didn't say anything about "it will be considered abondonment of AOS or have negative impact on it"
more...
Anish_Sen
02-05 10:42 AM
My parents are going back to India in April'10 just before completion of their 6 months. But they want to come back again after 3 weeks. They have got their visa for 1 year. So they can stay another 4 months on their 2nd trip from May'10 to Aug'10.
Is it going to be a problem during their next visa stamping or immigration at airport as they will end up staying 10 months in US out of their 1 year approved visa ?
Please advise.
Is it going to be a problem during their next visa stamping or immigration at airport as they will end up staying 10 months in US out of their 1 year approved visa ?
Please advise.
2010 Jake Gyllenhaal 2011 Golden
bitzbytz
10-27 04:32 PM
For AC21, is it an issue if we accept a job in another state than the one where you filed for Perm
more...
mrsr
08-10 10:06 PM
I buy your words, I think they are working half day on saturdays
hair to the Golden Globe Awards
smartboy75
08-25 04:51 PM
Hi all
I have been trying to use the POJ method to reach an IO but looks like USCIS has shutdown that option. After entering the receipt number it simply reads out the online status message and does not provide any option to reach a CSR.
Looks like eccessive status calls have caused this.
Has anyone still been able to use the POJ method today and if yes can u pls post the details ??
Thanks
I have been trying to use the POJ method to reach an IO but looks like USCIS has shutdown that option. After entering the receipt number it simply reads out the online status message and does not provide any option to reach a CSR.
Looks like eccessive status calls have caused this.
Has anyone still been able to use the POJ method today and if yes can u pls post the details ??
Thanks
more...
Blog Feeds
12-13 11:20 PM
Immigration Lawyers Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
The January 2011 Visa Bulletin shows significant retrogression of family-based categories with priority dates falling back as much as one to three years. The 1st preference category (unmarried children of U.S. citizens) shows an increased wait from 5 years to 6 years. The 2A preference category (spouses and children of legal permanent residents) suffers the largest setback with an increase from 4 months to 3 years, while the 2B preference category (unmarried adult children of legal permanent residents) experiences an increase from 5 1/2 to 8 years. The 3rd preference category (married children of U.S. citizens) shows an increase from 8 1/2 years to 10 years. The 4th preference category (brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens) was the only family-based category unaffected by the retrogression, remaining at a 9 year wait.
Employment-based categories did not experience any retrogression and are as follows: EB-1 remains current for all countries; EB-2 remains current, except for India (May 2006) and China (June 2006); EB-3 is at Mar. 2005 for all countries, except for India (Feb. 2002), China (Dec. 2003), and Mexico (April 2003); EB-3 other workers is at April 2003 for all countries, except India (Feb. 2002); EB-4, religious workers, EB-5, and targeted employment areas and regional centers are all current.
To view the January 2011 visa bulletin, see http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5212.html
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/MqJ3r3NtuVk
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/MqJ3r3NtuVk/january_2011_visa_bulletin_shows_major_retrogressi on_in_family-based_categories.html)
The January 2011 Visa Bulletin shows significant retrogression of family-based categories with priority dates falling back as much as one to three years. The 1st preference category (unmarried children of U.S. citizens) shows an increased wait from 5 years to 6 years. The 2A preference category (spouses and children of legal permanent residents) suffers the largest setback with an increase from 4 months to 3 years, while the 2B preference category (unmarried adult children of legal permanent residents) experiences an increase from 5 1/2 to 8 years. The 3rd preference category (married children of U.S. citizens) shows an increase from 8 1/2 years to 10 years. The 4th preference category (brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens) was the only family-based category unaffected by the retrogression, remaining at a 9 year wait.
Employment-based categories did not experience any retrogression and are as follows: EB-1 remains current for all countries; EB-2 remains current, except for India (May 2006) and China (June 2006); EB-3 is at Mar. 2005 for all countries, except for India (Feb. 2002), China (Dec. 2003), and Mexico (April 2003); EB-3 other workers is at April 2003 for all countries, except India (Feb. 2002); EB-4, religious workers, EB-5, and targeted employment areas and regional centers are all current.
To view the January 2011 visa bulletin, see http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5212.html
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/MqJ3r3NtuVk
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/MqJ3r3NtuVk/january_2011_visa_bulletin_shows_major_retrogressi on_in_family-based_categories.html)
hot The Ultimate TAYLOR SWIFT
wc_user
07-27 01:54 PM
It turns out that it was the photos. I had already sent it. So, don't know why they are asking again. I am resending the photos now. I had a question. Though it is simple, I don't want to take any chances as we are planning a travel soon. They have asked me to write my name and Alien number on the back of the photo in pencil or felt pen. I tried writing using a pencil and it is not readable. So, what is a felt pen ? Is the idea here that whatever is written on the back of the photo should not leave an impression on the front of the photo. Thanks for your response.
more...
house 2010 Golden Globes Red Carpet:
nixstor
09-02 05:45 PM
Great! Thanks for updating every one.
tattoo After receiving a Golden
gc4vk
12-13 02:48 PM
Hello,
My wife is currently working on H1B, she was offer permanent position at the client she is working, she has to get on to EAD to take permanent position.
both my wife and myself got EAD's in Oct 07, my question is does she has to invoke AC21 to get on to EAD.
I am the primary candidate for our GC Process.
Thanks in Advance
Pd: EB3, Aug 04
I 140 : Jan 07
485: Jul 07
My wife is currently working on H1B, she was offer permanent position at the client she is working, she has to get on to EAD to take permanent position.
both my wife and myself got EAD's in Oct 07, my question is does she has to invoke AC21 to get on to EAD.
I am the primary candidate for our GC Process.
Thanks in Advance
Pd: EB3, Aug 04
I 140 : Jan 07
485: Jul 07
more...
pictures Taylor Swift Golden Globes
sweet_jungle
09-30 12:42 PM
I don't think that's possible. USCIS wants a physical address where you stay and will not deliver mail to PO box. In fact there is no forwarding of documents sent by USCIS too. They are all returned to USCIS.
This issue I think originates from the fact that USCIS wants to know where all aliens are physically staying.
I wanted to have a PO box to avoid any issues with mail theft and my lawyer said its not possible.
Anything different coming from your lawyer would be welcome.
Regards.
Lawyer also has given whatever your lawyer said.
However, I know of few cases where people received green cards at their po boxes. If you call up custmer service, they will be happy to change the I-485 addresses to po box addresses.
This issue I think originates from the fact that USCIS wants to know where all aliens are physically staying.
I wanted to have a PO box to avoid any issues with mail theft and my lawyer said its not possible.
Anything different coming from your lawyer would be welcome.
Regards.
Lawyer also has given whatever your lawyer said.
However, I know of few cases where people received green cards at their po boxes. If you call up custmer service, they will be happy to change the I-485 addresses to po box addresses.
dresses Taylor Swift at AMAsThe
vegaspd
06-01 06:32 PM
I checked with different attorney and they say that my attorney did not file interfiling letter for my 140. Is that going to effect my application. What is the format for interfiling letter.
Please help
Thanks
Vegaspd
Please help
Thanks
Vegaspd
more...
makeup taylor swift grammys red
Steve Mitchell
February 11th, 2004, 11:35 AM
As of right now, retailers have no knowledge of this happening. Does not mean it's true or false, just the fact is retailers are not aware. As of the time of this posting.